Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2682 days newer than Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-5820K - 217 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5820K | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |