In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5775C
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – May 15, 2015 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
175 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
88%
Price, $
$400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 15th, 2015 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
