In Deathloop, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5775C
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – May 15, 2015 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3550
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 15th, 2015 | Released | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
