In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5775C
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – May 15, 2015 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
175 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 15th, 2015 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
