In Atomfall, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $163 cheaper!
Core i7-5775C
- Up to 29% cheaper – $400.00 vs $563.41
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Atomfall – $1.90 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
210 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
85%
Price, $
$400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
70%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
84%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$366.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
