In Rust, the Core i7-5775C is slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $130 cheaper!
Core i7-5775C
- Up to 25% cheaper – $400.00 vs $529.95
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 9% better value in Rust – $1.76 vs $1.93/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 274 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
226 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
62%
Price, $
$400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
274 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
91%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$366.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
