In Rust, the Core i7-5775C is slower than the Core i9-12900K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $111 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 19% faster in Rust – 268 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 28% cheaper – $289.00 vs $400.00
- Up to 28% cheaper
- Up to 39% better value in Rust – $1.07 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 39% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
226 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
66%
Price, $
$400
72%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
61%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
268 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
83 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$366.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
