In Atomfall, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $200 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 50% cheaper – $199.99 vs $400.00
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall – $0.92 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
210 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
96%
Price, $
$400
49%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
48%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$366.00 | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
