In Atomfall, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $19 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $380.99 vs $400.00
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 8% better value in Atomfall – $1.74 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 8% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
210 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
96%
Price, $
$400
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
92%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
