In Rust, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $70 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 234 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 18% cheaper – $329.95 vs $400.00
- Up to 18% cheaper
- Up to 20% better value in Rust – $1.41 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 20% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
226 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
90%
Price, $
$400
82%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
80%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
