In Rust, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $252 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 230 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 63% cheaper – $148.07 vs $400.00
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Rust – $0.64 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
226 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
95%
Price, $
$400
37%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
36%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
