In Atomfall, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $216 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 54% cheaper – $183.99 vs $400.00
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in Atomfall – $0.85 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
209 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
97%
Price, $
$400
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
45%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$183.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
