In Atomfall, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $235 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 59% cheaper – $165.17 vs $400.00
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $0.77 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
209 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
99%
Price, $
$400
41%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
40%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
212 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
