In Atomfall, the Core i7-5775C is slightly faster than the Core i3-7100T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $375 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
Core i3-7100T
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
- Up to 94% cheaper – $25.00 vs $400.00
- Up to 94% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$400
6%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
6%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
201 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
96%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
