In Deathloop, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $301 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – May 15, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 75% cheaper – $98.95 vs $400.00
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop – $0.43 vs $1.81/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
220 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
98%
Price, $
$400
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
24%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 15th, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
