In Rust, the Core i7-5775C is slightly faster than the Celeron G1610. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $351 more expensive!
Core i7-5775C
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 226 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – May 15, 2015 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Celeron G1610
- Up to 88% cheaper – $49.00 vs $400.00
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Rust – $0.23 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$400
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
13%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
75%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 15th, 2015 | Released | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $366.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
