In Control, the Core i7-5700HQ is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5700HQ
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jun 02, 2015 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-5700HQ vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5700HQ
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5700HQ Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1156 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 5600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
