In Deathloop, the Core i7-5700HQ is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 3600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5700HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-5700HQ vs Ryzen 5 3600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$73.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5700HQ
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5700HQ Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600 Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AM4 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
