In Atomfall, the Core i7-5700HQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5700HQ
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 47 vs 127 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i9-9900KS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 220 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Oct 28, 2019 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i9-9900KS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i9-9900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i9-9900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5700HQ
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i9-9900KS
Oct 28th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5700HQ Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KS Oct 28th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Oct 28th, 2019 |
$378.00 | MSRP | $513.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1151 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 127 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 5600 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
