In Deathloop, the Core i7-5700HQ is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5700HQ
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jun 02, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5700HQ
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5700HQ Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 5600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
