In Atomfall, the Core i7-5700HQ is slightly faster than the Core i3-3220T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5700HQ
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jun 02, 2015 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
92%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5700HQ vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5700HQ
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5700HQ Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
