In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-5600U is slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 32% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 125 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5600U vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
125 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$274.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5600U vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5600U vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5600U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5600U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$393.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
