In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-5600U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 38% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 65 FPS
- Up to 38% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5600U vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5600U vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5600U vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5600U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5600U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$393.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
