In Atomfall, the Core i7-4980HQ is slightly faster than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4980HQ
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 17 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4980HQ vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4980HQ vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4980HQ vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4980HQ
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4980HQ Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
