In Atomfall, the Core i7-4960HQ is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4960HQ
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4960HQ
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4960HQ Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
