In Atomfall, the Core i7-4960HQ is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4960HQ
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
212 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4960HQ vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4960HQ
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4960HQ Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1151 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
