In Atomfall, the Core i7-4940MX is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4940MX
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 206 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 57 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4940MX vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4940MX vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4940MX vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4940MX Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | – |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
57 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
