In Atomfall, the Core i7-4940MX is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4940MX
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 55 vs 57 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4940MX vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4940MX Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 57 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
