In Deathloop, the Core i7-4940MX is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4940MX
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 57 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 12% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4940MX vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4940MX Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1151 |
57 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
