In A Plague Tale: Requiem, the Core i7-4940MX is slightly slower than the Core i3-3220T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4940MX
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Jan 20, 2014 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 3% faster in A Plague Tale: Requiem – 198 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in A Plague Tale: Requiem
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 35 vs 57 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
A Plague Tale: Requiem FPS Calculator
Core i7-4940MX vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4940MX Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 57 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
