In Deathloop, the Core i7-4930MX is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4930MX
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 57 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4930MX
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4930MX Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1366 |
57W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
