In Deathloop, the Core i7-4910MQ is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 3600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4910MQ
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4910MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4910MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4910MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4910MQ
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4910MQ Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $570.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | AM4 |
47W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
