In Atomfall, the Core i7-4910MQ is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4910MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 days newer – Jan 27, 2025 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 11 years and 7 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4910MQ vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4910MQ vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4910MQ vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4910MQ
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 27th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4910MQ Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 27th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2025 |
$570.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
47W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
