In Deathloop, the Core i7-4910MQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4910MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 239 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4910MQ vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4910MQ vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4910MQ vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4910MQ
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4910MQ Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $570.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
