In F1 25, the Core i7-4900MQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 11% faster in F1 25 – 197 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in F1 25
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$450.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4900MQ
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4900MQ Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $570.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
47W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
