In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4900MQ is slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4900MQ
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4900MQ Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| $570.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
