In Atomfall, the Core i7-4900MQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i7-8700K
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4900MQ
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4900MQ Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| $570.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1151 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
