In Starfield, the Core i7-4870HQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4870HQ
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 47 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 2% faster in Starfield – 93 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Starfield
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Jul 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
93 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4870HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4870HQ Jul 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA2066 |
47W | Power Consumption | 165W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
