In Atomfall, the Core i7-4870HQ is slightly faster than the Core i5-3320M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4870HQ
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 29 days newer – Jul 01, 2014 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 2 years and 29 days newer
Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i5-3320M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
93%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i5-3320M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i5-3320M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4870HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4870HQ Jul 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2014 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
