In Atomfall, the Core i7-4870HQ is slightly faster than the Core i3-3220T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4870HQ
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jul 01, 2014 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
186 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
92%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4870HQ vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4870HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4870HQ Jul 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
