The Core i7-4860HQ is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4860HQ
The Core i7-6700T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-6700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
98%
Min 1% FPS
119
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$89.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-6700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4860HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $303.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Skylake |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
