The Core i7-4860HQ is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3210. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4860HQ
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
The Core i7-4860HQ is better in every way
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-3210 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-3210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4860HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
47 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
