The Core i7-4860HQ is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G1820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4860HQ
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 47 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G1820
The Core i7-4860HQ is better in every way
Core i7-4860HQ vs Celeron G1820 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
168
94%
Min 1% FPS
113
95%
Price, $
$31.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core i7-4860HQ vs Celeron G1820 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Celeron G1820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Celeron G1820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4860HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Crystal Well | Codename | Haswell |
47 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |