In Atomfall, the Core i7-4850HQ is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2667 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4850HQ
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 201 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 47 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Is 4 months and 3 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 4 months and 3 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4850HQ vs Xeon E5-2667 v2: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4850HQ vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4850HQ vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4850HQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4850HQ Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2667 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA2011 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
