In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-4850HQ is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4850HQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 38% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 134 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 38% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4850HQ vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
134 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4850HQ vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4850HQ vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4850HQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4850HQ Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1700 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
