Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i7-4820K
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $199.88 vs $744.95
- Up to 69% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.93 vs $3.03 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Fortnite than Core i7-4820K - 246 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
215
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
31%
Price, $
$744.95
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $744.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7151 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |