The Core i7-4820K is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $101.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
The Ryzen 3 3100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 51% cheaper – $97.89 vs $199.88
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 3100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
91%
Min 1% FPS
115
93%
Price, $
$199.88
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
45%
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$97.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 3100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 3100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 3100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4820K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |