The Core i7-4820K is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-9370 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $12.14 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 6% cheaper – $199.88 vs $212.02
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 130 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the FX-9370
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-4820K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-4820K vs FX-9370 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Core i7-4820K vs FX-9370 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4820K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
130 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
