In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-4820K is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a better value for money, as it's $88 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 237 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 31% cheaper – $199.88 vs $288.00
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.84 vs $1.35/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
213 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
90%
Price, $
$288
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
62%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
