In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-4820K is slightly faster than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $308 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 237 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 65% cheaper – $168.02 vs $476.00
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.70 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i9-14900F
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
178 FPS
100%
Price, $
$168.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
213 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
90%
Price, $
$476
35%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
